Npr what do ya know
Show Search Search Query. Play Live Radio. Next Up:. Available On Air Stations. All Streams. By Audie Cornish ,. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email. Focusing on the impact of technology in our lives, Dr. Moira Gunn presents interviews with Internet entrepreneurs, scientists, astronauts, media critics, sci-fi novelists, and politicians. Latino USA, the radio journal of news and culture, is the only nationally distributed English-language radio program produced from a Latino perspective.
It combines high-quality news, cultural and public affairs journalism to bring a rich understanding to a wide spectrum of listeners. Test your knowledge against some of the best and brightest in the news and entertainment world while figuring out what's real news and what's made up with NPR's weekly hour-long quiz program. If you are exhausted by the news but can't seem to focus on anything else, this weekly show with former NPR political reporter Sam Sanders will help.
It's Been a Minute is an irreverent, casual space to process the pace of current events and get introduced to new favorites in music, TV and more. It's a wrap of the week paired with deep dive interviews with musicians, actors, and newsmakers.
As Sam says, "The world is complicated; let's talk it out. Listeners will hear stories about race and identity that expand their minds, and learn practical ways to make their lives better.
Planet Money explains the economy with playful storytelling and Peabody award-winning deep dive journalism. Guy Raz hosts How I Built This, where innovators, entrepreneurs, and idealists take us through the often challenging journeys they took to build their now iconic companies.
The two programs pair back-to-back with a focus on the economy and business. Latino arts and culture explained with music and conversation, presented by Felix Contreras. Questioning the meaning of life. A culinary, culture and lifestyle program celebrating food and its ability to touch lives and feed the soul.
Award-winning host Lynne Rossetto Kasper leads a journey of the senses and hosts discussions with a variety of personalities who share their passion for culinary delights. Shankar brings his signature knowledge, wit and sense of humor to this one-hour weekly program. A blend of science and storytelling, Hidden Brain reveals the patterns that drive human behavior, the biases that shape our choices, and the imperceptible forces that influence our relationships.
It's a program that helps curious people understand the world, current events, and themselves. Radiolab is a show about curiosity. Where sound illuminates ideas, and the boundaries blur between science, philosophy, and human experience.
Hosted by Jad Abumrad with co-host Robert Krulwich, the show is designed for listeners who demand skepticism, but appreciate wonder and want to be moved and surprised. Radiolab won Peabody Awards in and Veteran journalists Brooke Gladstone and Bob Garfield decode what we hear, read and see in the media every day. With compelling reporting and uncommon insight, the program uncovers the significant issues of the day and carefully exposes the relationship of the media to culture and society.
For all the Scandinavian ancestors out there, I would like to recommend the Door County show wyk door cty. I sure wish this show was still running.
The latest update on the plumbing is that the City received the work order last week to repair the busted and clogged pipes, however our landlord was not given a time frame for when they will be out to repair the pipes. Fortunately, we can use all the restrooms in the office at this time. However, we have been asked to keep what goes down the pipes to a minimum. Happy Monday! You are the best! This got to be the funnies interview ever… Stan Lemkuil, master of over vocal sound effects IMDb.
First interview of the show. Hi ya, Trying to listen to Phoenix, and the mp3 is MB, but no audio. Can you fix this so I can hear the Glen Campbell segment? Many thanks! And always on the forefront of technology, you asked an audience member computer programmer about touchscreens Yes, touchscreens—in ! I too am waiting for a program that my daughter was on to be released to your archives. Wondering if you need any assistance getting things online? I hear references to Mr. Trump in many of the shows.
I guess media personalities like yourself gave him the recognition over 35 years to be able to run for president with a pst name recognition. A learning experience. You interviewed her. Is there any chance at all that this particular clip could be found? Or, is there any chance you will be updating your archives so that I can find it? She is now 22 and never became an actual Goth Girl…that we know of… It would be a precious piece of family history.
An unfortunate occurrence for a humor show… A guy called in, you asked if he was married. He replied no, his wife and child died! Very unusual proclamation at from the mayor, trying to outhumor the host…. Writing is what I do for a living and I am so passionate about this. I have worked with several associations whose mission is to help people solve problems.
I love traveling and have visited several places in the past few years. My books are available in several parts of the world. Being a part of this team has open more opportunities for me to excel as a writer. I have worked with different people and met many clients as a writer. I can handle any kind of writing project and provide nothing but the best. People come to me all the time to ask if I can solve their assignment problems and I accept. I find pleasure in assisting them to solve their problems as a professional.
Saturdays have not been the same for awhile now. Do you have any merchandise for sale, shirts, hats, etc.? Is this the Mike Feldman that grew up in Fairfield Iowa?
Email me at below email. I help students in all areas of the writing steps. I can also write the essay from start to finish. My career as a professional writer started during my school years. After learning that I was very skilled in the field of academic writing, I decided to take it up as a job. This is very newsworthy, You are a rattling expert blogger. I get joined your consume and wait advancing to hunt solon of your magnificent business.
Reminded me of Leo Kottke… Who am i thinking of? Was his name Michael? Mike, Love you, hope your well. I was 14 lol Anyhoot, wanted you to know that ALL the shows after thru to end of year in archive are just blank static. I have been restoring some choice shows. They are badly overmodulated and some of the tapes are bad but it has been a treat to have this trove! The first show that is just static is actually I noted that three years ago in a comment on this page.
Great trove, agreed! You were right! He was a real professional! Either way? Thanks for the hours of enjoyable listening you provided! Best of wishes to you and good luck in ALL your ventures. Yours Sincerely, John. A great show.
Thank you!!! You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. RSS - Posts. Whad'ya Know? Plus, Lyle has been let out of his soundproof booth and takes over the show every time.
Look no further! Rich Says:. Seth Thomas Says:. Nadia Says:. Stan Laulederkind Says:. Dag Ekeberg Says:. Insure my laptop Says:.
Marshall Says:. Fantasy Puppet Theater Says:. Paul Schilling Says:. Congressman in Washington says, yes, I heard that she has died. We went on the air and said that Representative Giffords had died and she hadn't. We made a number of mistakes there. The deputy in Arizona really wasn't a reliable source. The congressman in Washington certainly wasn't a reliable source. Two, two un—. MM: Can I retrack that? The congressman in Washington didn't have first-hand information. Two bad sources do not make one good one.
They don't make any good one. That was a, that was a painful lesson. It reinforced that we needed this kind of reportable process in place. So, I mean, nobody meant to do that. People were working hard to try get a, get a story.
It would've been much better to have been second or third or fourth, rather than to be first and very wrong. RW: We had another question from Lara Hussein, and Lara asks, "Is there support for creating a journalist credential or licensure as a means of establishing who is a trained journalist and reestablishing credibility within the profession? BS: Well, certainly journalists needs to be as skilled and as smart as the possible can. The road to credentialing and licensing is one that is exceptionally dangerous.
BS: Perhaps. And I'll let those other professions argue for themselves. Journalism is distinct in the role it has in a society. If we were to move towards licensing in any form or credentialing, that it is quite possible that a government agency at some level would step into that role in some fashion and that would impinge on the role of a free press. RW: So inherently the tension that must exist between the press and the government means government regulation becomes dangerous.
AF: To practice journalism? I don't-- I mean, you don't even need a bachelor's degree. AF: No, I don't think so. I mean, you know, we're in a, we're in an era right now where the government considers journalists the enemies of the people, right? And so, how could you possibly have a system that, that was looking out for the best interests of listeners, readers, and the public, right?
KG: We do have codes of ethics, which we use to govern ourselves and they're on our websites and these are things that we say we will abide by and you can hold us to it. And it's things like how we'll treat sources, the balance in our reporting, not having a conflict of interest, our commitment is to the truth. We don't, you know, ally ourselves with people or organizations in the community. That's one way as a consumer, you can, you know, decide if it's a valuable source for your news.
RW: President Trump himself has made several public misstatements. Mark, what is NPR's policy on calling something a lie, no matter whose mouth it comes from? You have to be able to read that person's mind to be understand whether they are deliberately lying, whether they are deliberately misleading you or they are deliberately giving you misinformation. Or, are they just trying to obfuscate?
Or are they just, their conversation is going in five different directions and you don't know exactly what it is they said? So we have, again, this goes back to something we were talking earlier about, labels.
We've tended to try to focus on action words. You know, is that statement supported by any fact? If it isn't, we'll say "unsupported by the facts. RW: I think of the claim the president has made of the number of those in the country illegally who voted in the last election. NPR has been pretty careful to point out that that's not substantiated. MM: Right, careful to point out that state attorneys general across the country have said, we don't have any evidence of that happening.
And we want to try to get as many as people as we can to hear and read our stories. RW: What about the tenth time someone makes the assertion that is incorrect? If you can't, you can't get into their head, but do all appearances point to that being a lie? MM: We may get to that point. We will make a judgment. There may come a time where the intent is clear from the number of times or from the context or from the setting.
That will be a pretty, for us at least, monumental day. EJ: I think so. I'm with Mark and the rest of the NPR management on this issue.
I think that if the word is going to be used, it needs to be used very, very sparingly, and the goal, as Mark said, is to report news that everyone can hear without immediately jumping to judgments and that's a very loaded word.
RW: Let's talk now about how to deal with news sources. We've seen a blitz of investigative stories in recent weeks, many around the Trump administration's connections to Russia, which have relied heavily on unnamed sources.
There are also cases where sources may need protection for other reasons. Kelley, you dealt with a recent case at CPR that had to do with masking a source's identity. Will you tell us about that? KG: You know, it's not what we want to do, because we want to be as transparent about who we've talked to and it helps hold that source accountable and anybody else in the story.
RW: If they use their first and last name, it's harder to escape from that statement. And, certainly if you ever see a good journalism outlet using "sources said," there's been a big vetting process, that their editors know who are the sources. They can rely on a source. And so we had a story that we were working on. We're doing stories about how people are affected by Trump policies for better or worse. We want to just know how people think he will affect their lives.
And so we were talking to a young man who's sixteen in Grand Junction and he's the son of parents who are not here legally. He wanted to talk about the life he had built in Grand Junction, but we've seen these instances where, a few of them in the country, where people who have come out have been picked up by immigration services. So one of the things that we are doing in our role is to say the source may not even quite understand the impact of being in a news story, so we sometimes have to weigh that for them, and we didn't want to give away details.
So it came down to we didn't want to be giving his name when it could put him at risk and his family, and the story was important to tell. So, you know, we asked listeners to trust us, that we know his story is accurate, and we had lots of sources in his community verifying. His teachers, his principal, people who knew him and we thought it was a legitimate way to tell the story. But it's never a decision we make lightly. RW: Isn't it possible that there are some in the audience who would see identifying that source and the potential repercussion of having that young person's family arrested because they were here illegally as a journalism win?
In other words, CPR News did its job by helping expose those in the country illegally? What would you say to that? KG: I, that wasn't our job that day. I was, you know, it was like telling the story of someone. We're trying to explain the community to the community, and how many more people in difficult circumstances would talk to a journalist if we appeared to be swooping in and bringing the authorities right behind us?
I mean, we have to protect relationships or you guys won't hear the stories that people have to tell, and if we breach the trust, we won't get you those stories. RW: Adrian Florido, are you often asked, sure, I'd love to talk to you, but don't use my name? AF: It depends on the situation, you know? And I'll, usually my first response is to call Mark and say, hey, there's this source who wants to tell me his or her story, but doesn't want to use a name.
And then Mark's question will be, well, why doesn't this person want to use, want their name used? And sometimes it's because they feel that they are in danger of, for example, being deported. Sometimes it's because they want to say things that are just kind of, I don't know, unseemly or that are kind of controversial that they don't really want to be associated with.
In that case, we don't ever allow people to not use their names, right? Because if they're not willing to stand by a statement, then why would we put it out there? RW: It's that accountability factor Kelley was talking about. To the question now of whom news organizations should cover. I think it's fair to say that most outlets were surprised when President Trump won, and one of the explanations that many people gave was that the media had somehow failed to hear the voices of people who were really disaffected, people particularly in rural areas, who'd lost manufacturing jobs.
A lot of those folks voted for Trump. NPR seemed to respond to that recently by assigning a reporter to cover the urban-rural divide. He's a former Coloradan. Mark, is that the network's attempt to reach out to people in those Trump strongholds, even perhaps a bit of a mea culpa from NPR?
MM: Not exactly. The beat was established before the election, during the campaign, when we and other media probably realized that there was something happening. We may not have caught it all.
Why not go in and find out and listen to them, and really dig into the issues? We're really looking at the issues that are driving people in urban and rural areas. Yes, there may be some divisions there, but there's also some just really interesting stories and different ways of looking at things.
We tracked it all. If you want to, if you want to see where all the reporting was, you can see the statistics that are still on the ombudsman's page, on the NPR website. EJ: All the stories were there.
I think it was a question of emphasis of the story. So one of the concerns I had was really digging in to some of these issues. You know, healthcare, what are the policy, where are the candidates really standing and what are these, what is the granular look at all of these policies?
Those stories were there but they were one-offs. They tended to sometimes get lost in the coverage, the day in, day out horse race. There wasn't a lot of polling coverage, but there was a fair amount of horse race coverage. RW: That is the reporting that follows the candidate and goes to the next campaign rally and the next and the next and the next, and in that churning, in that cycle, it's really hard to take a step back, isn't it?
EJ: Right, and you have to sort of, if someone says something outrageous or if there's a scandal, you of course have to cover it, but I think it's a question of how much emphasis you give. So these stories are all there, but the question is getting them to surface at a time to draw attention to them, to really come back to them, to not say, okay, we've done that story and walk away, but to really come back and really examine it if it, if it proves to be a, an ongoing issue.
Because Colorado is a state of such contrasts between urban and rural and the conservative and liberal and unaffiliated. What has changed, if anything, since the election, do you think? KG: Well, I'd like to go back just for a sec on why I think, you were, you were asking did the press miss this.
I do think there was excessive reliance on polls, and I do think it happened at NPR, as well. It always came down to, you know, who's ahead now, that horse race sense, that very early I remember hearing reporters saying if the election were today or, and it was so far in advance of the election and I [crosstalk]—.
KG: Right, because it turns out it's not going to be today, you know? And I, I don't really let us use those. I don't think that polls, they're, I won't say never, it's not a good policy. But I think a poll has to do a lot to be of value in our reporting, because what's important, I think, for us to dig up is what, who these candidates are and what they would do and what they have done. And so, I feel really strongly that we should help people be the kind of well-informed civic people, you know, that you know enough about what's going on and we need to make it compelling and we need to get the clutter away so that what we give you is incisive to make your decisions.
We did a very extensive work on our website with profiles of candidates and the ballot measures and we had, I think, more than half a million people use that page as they were understanding the election this year. So, I'd like to see more of that, but as far as—. So we are doing something that we just, we're calling right now Trump Tracking: The Trump Effect to see these stories of people who are kind of in the line of change, either because they're a business-owner who's eager to have the ACA off their back is how they view it, or they're the undocumented or the immigrant who doesn't know the status as a DREAMer under the DACA.
We want to find these people now and keep in touch so that we can start to tell the stories of how change in Washington is affecting Colorado. RW: And we erected a dining table in our lobby for something called Breaking Bread. Do you want to talk a bit about that? KG: Yes. That is a project where we want to get people who are willing to talk across the divide.
0コメント