Life why are we here

And What Does the Bible Say? The Bible is a story about God entering into relationship with his creation. It provides compelling answers to four major questions: Why are we here? What went wrong? What did God do to make things right?

And: Where are we going? Why Are We Here? Genesis is the beginning of a love story: God fashioned us and loves us. God wants us to live in his presence; he is our loving heavenly Father. God made us for a purpose: he made us to be like him and wants us to reflect his glory. God put us in charge and commissioned us to rule the earth for him 5.

We are dependent on our Creator and should trust him. Since they have placed the Creator at the centre of their life, he takes part in what they do, in everything they bring into being. He is present in their every thought and feeling. They were thinking it was impossible to meet God, to become one with him, but in fact this meeting, this union, happens every day, without their even realizing it! Every day, they grow in faith, hope and love; every day, light and peace increase within them.

And you will probably be graded, but may not be; we're not sure when or even if you'll ever find out what your grade is, and we might know who will or won't be grading your papers, - but then again, we may be wrong. And that mission can be known. And that mission can either be "accomplished," or not. For now, we could treat this idea as a "hypothesis" that we can test. One way we could test it could be by assuming it to be true for a while, and seeing what happens.

Does it clarify things, or make things better? Or the opposite? Or, you can treat the opposite as a "testable hypothesis. Does this clarify things, or make them better? It's worth looking into. We think even putting some serious effort into this might not be a bad idea.

We here at LiveReal we aren't necessarily in the business of giving answers, even if we could. After all, if we gave you an answer, why should you believe us, or anybody else?

In these realms, there are ways that each of us has no choice but to seek out our own answers. Even if we check with others and get help along the way. At any rate, whenever anyone digs into this sort of question deliberately, the typical scenario runs something like this:. We look at the question, wrestle with it for a few seconds, and pick an answer that seems right at the time - sometimes for good reasons, sometimes not.

Sometimes the answers we decide on at the time are a little too easy. For example, we might decide that our purpose in life is "to have fun" if we're young, "to love" if we've fallen for a certain hottie nearby, "to get rich" if we want lots of money, and so on. We then tend to assume that it's correct, or at least the best we can do for now, and then live out our lives based on that answer. We might repeat this same process many times as life goes on, slightly amending our answer to fit in a little better with whatever experiences we bump into along the way.

This is a question that has been asked by many people for a long time. So, have any of them found an answer? Is there a "right" answer?

Have we made any progress is this endeavor? Or does this kind of question simply get asked, over and over again, with each person starting all over again from scratch?

Or is there such a thing as "progress" in this area, the same way there is "progress" in physics, chemistry, or math? This much seems clear: we have to answer this.

No one can really do it for us. It seems like knowing yourself is a good idea. Or, actually: not knowing yourself seems like a pretty bad idea. So, getting to know yourself could be a way to spend time that isn't a total waste.

But how? We explore some of that here. And of course, a lot of this can trigger a nice juicy existential crisis , which can be a good thing. Because it can get us asking seriously about the question of meaning in life , and meaninglessness.

If there is some kind of meaning to all this, and if we are here for a reason or purpose, then it means that we probably have some sense that we ought to act a certain way, or live our lives in such a way that we're singing in tune or living in harmony with that purpose.

Or if we decide that that purpose involves something like " love " or " God " or solving the problem of life or attaining spiritual enlightenment or even just trying to ease a little bit of suffering here and there, then there may be some new realms to explore in those areas as well. Maybe by running a few experiments yourself, which might yield some fruit along the lines of experiential spirituality or antifragile happiness. What is sacred? Of what is the spirit made? What is worth living for?

And what is worth dying for? The answer to each is the same: only love. As such, we can also increase or decrease the value of our lives with practice, effort, action, and thought. He notes too that things change all the time: We move, meet new people, have fresh experiences, encounter new ideas, and age.

As we change, our values transform, and so does our sense of purpose, which we must continually work on. Surely there must be more to existence than simply assigning a value to what we already have and thinking differently if we fail to recognize purpose in our lives.

In fact, there are even less complex approaches to meaningfulness. While that may sound coy, many philosophers offer similar responses, although few as pithy.

It can be disconcerting, perhaps, to have such an easy answer. And detractors might argue that nothing can matter, given the immensity of the universe and the brevity of our lives. But this assumes our purpose is fixed, rigid and assigned externally, and not flexible or a product of the mind. There are other approaches, too. Casey Woodling, a professor of philosophy and religious studies at Coastal Carolina University in South Carolina, proposes in Philosophy Now that the question of meaningfulness itself offers an answer.

Reflecting on why we pursue those goals is significant, however. By taking a reflective perspective, significance itself accrues. The sixth-century Chinese sage Lao Tzu—who is said to have dictated the Tao Te Ching before escaping civilization for solitude in the mountains—believed the universe supplies our value.

Like Woodling, he would argue that goals are insignificant, and that accomplishments are not what makes our lives matter. But unlike Woodling, he suggests meaning comes from being a product of the world itself. No effort is necessary. Instead of reflection, Lao Tzu proposes a deep understanding of the essence of existence, which is mysterious. Life matters because we exist within and among living things, as part of an enduring and incomprehensible chain of existence.

Sometimes life is brutal, he writes, but meaning is derived from perseverance.